Candidate Qualifying
Summary
Candidate Qualifying; Requiring a candidate for federal office to state in writing whether he or she intends to trade stock while serving in federal office; requiring candidates to ensure they satisfy statutory and constitutional requirements for office; requiring certain candidates to provide to the filing officer a statement disclosing dual citizenship for nomination and election to a judicial office or to a district school board; requiring candidates for representative to Congress seeking ballot position by petition to obtain a specified percentage of signatures to qualify for such office, etc.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Last action Mar 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
S 620 c1
→
S 620 e1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was revised to add a new section allowing challenges to a candidate's eligibility if they fail to meet statutory or constitutional requirements. It also updated the list of required filings for federal candidates to include specific oaths regarding stock trading history and dual citizenship, while removing references to other state offices from the dual citizenship disclosure requirement.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to include a new enforcement mechanism for challenging candidate eligibility and was narrowed regarding which offices require dual citizenship disclosure (now limited to judicial and school board offices).
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new section creating a legal process for political parties or committees to challenge a candidate's eligibility in court if they believe the candidate will not meet all statutory and constitutional requirements.
REQUIREMENT
Modified the oath requirements for federal candidates to specifically ask about intent to trade stocks if elected and whether they traded stocks while previously holding federal office.
Modified the dual citizenship disclosure requirement to apply only to candidates for judicial office or district school board, removing the requirement for federal, state, county, and multicounty offices.
Removed the requirement for candidates to disclose outstanding fines, fees, or penalties exceeding $250 from the summary description.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 4, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Mar 4, 2026
D
Democratic11
90% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Mar 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
CS passed as amended; YEAS 37 NAYS 0
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendment(s) adopted (864144)
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/03/26, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
upper
Jan 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
upper
Jan 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/27/26, 1:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
upper
Jan 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced
upper
Jan 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable by Ethics and Elections; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
upper
Jan 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Ethics and Elections, 01/13/26, 4:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
upper
Dec 9, 2025
Committee
Referred to Ethics and Elections; Judiciary; Rules
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Debbie Mayfield
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 620
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand SB 620. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline