Candidate Qualification
Summary
Candidate Qualification; Providing eligibility requirements for persons seeking to qualify for nomination as candidates of a political party or as candidates with no party affiliation; providing that certain entities may bring an action for declaratory and injunctive relief based on a certain claim; prohibiting a person from qualifying as a candidate for election and prohibiting his or her name from appearing on the ballot under certain circumstances, etc.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 4, 2025
Last action Jun 16, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
S 280 Filed
→
S 280 c1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended from a simple filing to a committee substitute version that adds a new amendment to section 99.021 regarding candidate oaths. The eligibility requirements for candidates remain largely the same (365 days of party registration or no party affiliation), but the committee version adds specific language requiring candidates to state in writing during their oath that they meet the 365-day requirement. It also clarifies that political parties or other candidates for the office sought can bring legal actions for relief.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from only creating section 99.013 to also amending section 99.021 to include written oath requirements for candidates.
REQUIREMENT
Added new section 99.021 amendments requiring candidates to make written statements during their oath confirming they meet the 365-day registration requirement.
ELIGIBILITY
Changed '365 days' to '365 consecutive days' in the eligibility requirements for both party and non-party candidates.
ENFORCEMENT
Expanded who can bring legal actions from just political parties to include 'other candidate for the office sought'.
TECHNICAL
Added minor clarifying language about the timing of the qualifying period in the oath requirements.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 27, 2025
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Mar 27, 2025
D
Democratic10
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Mar 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
CS passed; YEAS 38 NAYS 0
upper
Mar 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 25 NAYS 0
upper
Mar 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/19/25, 11:30 am, 412 Knott Building
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 11 NAYS 0
upper
Mar 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 03/12/25, 8:30 am, 110 Senate Building
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Introduced
Introduced
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
upper
Feb 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Ethics and Elections, 03/03/25, 1:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Ethics and Elections; Judiciary; Rules
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kristen Arrington
DDemocratic
Co
Ed Hooper
RRepublican
Co
Jay Collins
RRepublican
Co
Tracie Davis
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 280
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand SB 280. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline