Civil Remedy for Parental Abduction
Summary
Civil Remedy for Parental Abduction; Provides civil cause of action if child is unlawfully abducted from parent for specified amount of time; provides standard of proof & specified damages; authorizes reasonable attorney fees & costs for either party; provides when specified timeframe begins; provides affirmative defenses; requires specified court division to preside over such cause of action; provides statute of limitations; tolling such statute of limitations.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2025
Last action Jun 16, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
H 1385 c1
→
H 1385 c2
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to expand its scope by adding detailed definitions for key terms like 'child' and 'parent,' clarifying when the 30-day unlawful abduction period begins, and establishing a statute of limitations with tolling provisions. These changes make the law more precise and ensure it applies consistently across different family law cases.
Scope change
The bill now explicitly defines 'child' and 'parent' in the context of time-sharing orders and clarifies procedural requirements for court assignment and filing deadlines.
DEFINITION
New definitions were added for 'child,' 'parent,' and 'unlawful abduction' to clarify who is protected and what actions constitute a violation.
REQUIREMENT
The timeframe for starting the 30-day abduction clock was clarified to begin at the time of abduction and continue until the child is returned, regardless of later scheduled visitation.
ENFORCEMENT
A statute of limitations of 2 years was added, with tolling during the period of unlawful abduction, and cases must be assigned to the family law division with prior jurisdiction.
ELIGIBILITY
Damages were modified to include treble actual damages with a minimum of $1,000, replacing the previous $10,000 flat amount.
Floor votes · House Apr 25, 2025
How they voted
107–0
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 118
Apr 25, 2025
D
Democratic34
88% Yea
R
Republican84
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Apr 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Rules
upper
Apr 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
CS passed; YEAS 108, NAYS 0
lower
Apr 18, 2025
Committee
Bill referred to House Calendar
lower
Apr 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported out of Judiciary Committee
lower
Apr 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with CS by Judiciary Committee
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Added to Judiciary Committee agenda
lower
Apr 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Now in Judiciary Committee
lower
Apr 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary Committee
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported out of Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with CS by Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
PCS added to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee agenda
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary Committee
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
2 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Michele Rayner
DDemocratic
P
Wallace Aristide
DDemocratic
Co
Alex Rizo
RRepublican
Co
Angie Nixon
DDemocratic
Co
Anna Eskamani
DDemocratic
Co
Ashley Gantt
DDemocratic
Co
Christine Hunschofsky
DDemocratic
Co
Dotie Joseph
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Mooney
RRepublican
Co
JL
Johanna López
DDemocratic
Co
Michelle Salzman
RRepublican
Co
Mike Gottlieb
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1385
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1385. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline