While the exact number of nurse vacancies in Delaware fluctuates, healthcare providers agree that the current shortage is unsustainable. Nursing shortages lead to missed nursing care, higher morbidity, and mortality rates. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) outlines a number of contributing factors impacting the current national nursing shortage. One is a lack of nursing school faculty - including the preceptors that provide supervision and instruction for clinical practice. Since Delaware’s nursing education programs must require clinical learning experiences provided by these preceptors, nursing students have difficulty completing the required coursework necessary for degree and licensure. Section 1 of this Act provides for an annual appropriation in an amount determined by the General Assembly to the Delaware Nursing Workforce Initiative or similar nonprofit to administer a program to provide funding to hospitals and clinical facilities to implement or continue offering preceptorship programs. Section 2 provides that this Act is effective 6 months after enactment.
Sponsored bills
This Act allows tenants who are being evicted for failure to pay rent to remain in their homes if they pay all amounts owed prior to being evicted. It also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Drafting Manual. This Substitute differs from the original Act by incorporating the changes from Senate Amendment No. 1 to Senate Bill No. 116 which includes the following changes: - Increased the time from 12 to 24 months for the lookback period for restricting the number of times the right of redemption is available to a tenant. - Puts a requirement to proactively file with the court a request for a stay of the writ if payment is made after the writ of possession has been posted. - Makes clear that payment after posting of the writ only stays the writ until the payment has cleared and dismissal is not required until such time. This Substitute also adds the following changes based on further input from stakeholders: - Makes it clear that this Act only applies to evictions based on failure to pay rent. - Clarifies that any rent that is due under the terms of the lease must also be paid, in addition to any demanded past due and per diem rent, for redemption to apply. - Adds language that the landlord may restrict any payments to methods accepted under the terms of the lease, and the landlord may further restrict any payments made after judgment is entered to certified checks or money orders.
Maddy summaryThis bill updates Delaware law to automatically make children eligible for state-funded child care assistance once they are placed in foster care. By removing the need for a separate application process, the legislation aims to ensure that children in foster care can immediately access care services without delay. The change directly impacts the Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the Purchase of Care program, and the families and foster parents caring for these children.
This Substitute for House Bill No. 383 specifies by position title which Department of Transportation employees must be paid overtime after working 37.5 hours in a week beginning July 1, 2026.
This Act simplifies the licensing requirements for youth camps that are accredited by the American Camp Association (ACA) by requiring that the Department of Education's Office of Child Care Licensing (OCCL) deem a youth camp as meeting all equivalent health and safety requirements necessary for a youth camp license if the youth camp has ACA accreditation through August 30 of the current calendar year. By streamlining the OCCL licensing requirements for youth camps, this Act also increases the availability of summer child care that is eligible for provider reimbursement from the Purchase of Care (POC) program. Under existing OCCL regulations, a youth camp has the option of applying for either license exempt status or a license. To obtain a license, a youth camp must meet very detailed and specific requirements that are challenging, if not impossible, for many youth camps. ACA accreditation requires that a camp satisfies health and safety requirements that are similar and equivalent, but not identical, to the OCCL license requirements. However, an ACA accredited but license-exempt youth camp is unable to receive POC provider reimbursement because under the state plan for the federal Child Care and Development Fund, license exempt child care providers are not eligible for provider reimbursement. This Act also codifies the following policies that are in the current OCCL child care licensing regulations: • A youth camp license and the definition of “youth camp”. • The requirement that a youth camp must have a valid Division of Public Health permit to be licensed or approved as license exempt. • The school-age care, programs, and activities that are exempt from child care license requirements. This Act is effective immediately and § 3003A(c)(4)b. of Title 14 must be implemented no later than December 31, 2026. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.
This House Joint Resolution directs the Judiciary to establish a Working Group to explore the feasibility of establishing a Housing Opportunity and Poverty Elimination (HOPE) Court Program in partnership with State agencies and community organizations and to provide recommendations for statewide implementation.
This Act clarifies and streamlines the disclosure and enforcement provisions of Delaware’s campaign finance laws. Among other things, this Act does the following: (1) Requires a political committee to submit written documentation of all loans provided to the committee and requires that proceeds of a loan are deposited into the committee’s account within 3 business days. (2) Prohibits candidates from charging interest on personal loans to a candidate committee. (3) Requires political committees to retain records for 5 years, rather than 3 years. (4) Requires the State Election Commissioner to provide the Division of Civil Rights and Public Trust (within the DOJ) with a monthly list of alleged violations of campaign finance laws and further clarifies that the Division must investigate and prosecute violations of campaign finance laws. (5) Expands the 1-time extension permitted for filing tardy reports from 24 hours to 48 hours after the reporting deadline. (6) Requires the Division of Civil Rights and Public Trust to submit an annual report of its activity to the Governor and the General Assembly. (7) Authorizes the Commissioner to create regulations relating to political committee audits. (8) Requires the Commissioner to create a mandatory biennial training program for candidates and treasurers. (9) Prohibits political committees from engaging in campaign finance activities 30 days after the issuance of a citation if the citation has not been resolved in that time.
House Substitute No. 1 for House Bill No. 301, like the original, updates the existing crime of “breach of peace or violence on election day.” Under this statute, it is unlawful to take the following actions on a day of election or early in-person voting or during the reading and counting of ballots with the intent to impede or interfere with the election: (1) The use of any violence or threats of violence at or near a polling place, a Department of Elections office, a meeting of the Board of Canvass, or any other place where votes are cast, stored, read, or counted; (2) A breach of peace at or near the same places; and (3) Hindering, controlling, coercing, or intimidating or attempting to hinder, control, coerce, or intimidate any qualified elector from exercising their right to vote. A violation of the statute is a class G felony. This substitute differs from the original HB 301 in that it makes the intent to impede or interfere with the election an element of the crime for any of the prohibited acts. It also adds “any other place where votes are cast, stored, read, or counted” to the locations where the acts are prohibited. It adds the third act of “hindering, controlling, coercing or intimidating a voter" from or in exercising their right to vote as a prohibited act.
This Act creates a new Grant-in-Aid Subcommittee (“Subcommittee”) of the Joint Finance Committee and codifies requirements and procedures for organizations seeking a grant-in-aid from the General Assembly. The Subcommittee will be composed of 3 members of the Senate and 3 members of the House, with the Chair alternating between the chambers each year. The Subcommittee will annually review and analyze the applications of grant-in-aid applicants who have not previously received funding through grant-in-aid and make recommendations to the Joint Finance Committee regarding which applications to approve and at what funding level. The Subcommittee may also review any current grant-in-aid recipient for program efficacy and compliance with the conditions of prior grants and general grant-in-aid eligibility requirements. This Act takes effect January 1 following its enactment into law.
This Act amends Chapter 1 of Title 15 and adds a Part VII and Chapter 81 to Title 15 of the Delaware Code to establish a “Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act,” (“the Act”). Section 1 of the Act amends Chapter 1 of Title 15 to provide definitions necessary for implementation of the Act. Chapter 1 is also amended to ensure that the purpose of Title 15 includes a stated public policy of equal opportunity to participate in the political process. Section 2 adds a “democracy canon” which instructs those charged with interpreting statutes, rules and regulations and local laws or ordinances related to the elective franchise to construe the election laws in favor of protecting and making accessible the right to vote. Section 3 of the Act adds a Part VII and Chapter 81 to Title 15 of the Delaware code to establish a “Delaware Voting Rights Act,” (“the Act”). Subchapter I of Part VII lists the mechanisms to challenge voting discrimination, specifying that election policy and practices approved by the General Assembly can be invalidated if they violate the Delaware Constitution, and stating that election laws or practices of a political subdivision or of officials with authority over elections acting within their discretionary authority may be invalidated if they cause prohibited voter suppression or dilution. Prohibited voter suppression prevents election policies or practices that result in, are likely to result in, or are motivated in whole or in part by the intent to result in: 1) a material disparity in voter participation, access to voting opportunities, or the opportunity or ability to participate in any stage of the political process between protected class members and other members of the electorate; or 2) based on the totality of the circumstances, an impairment of the equal opportunity or ability of protected class members to participate in any stage of the political process. A violation must be attributable to an action of the Department of Elections or a political subdivision. Voter suppression is not present where (i) the election policy or practice is necessary to significantly further an important and particularized governmental interest; and (ii) there is no alternative election policy or practice that results in a smaller disparity between protected class members and other members of the electorate. Voter suppression claims do not require evidence of intentional discrimination. Prohibited vote dilution prevents methods of election that have the effect, will likely have the effect, or are motivated in part by the intent of diluting the vote of protected class members. A violation is established when elections in the political subdivision exhibit racially polarized voting resulting in an impairment of the equal opportunity or ability of protected class members to nominate or elect candidates of their choice; or based on the totality of the circumstances, the equal opportunity, or ability of protected class members to nominate or elect candidates of their choice is impaired. To establish the violation, it must be shown that another method of election or changes to the existing method of election could constitutionally be adopted or ordered and would likely mitigate the impairment. Subchapter I also includes guidelines regarding voter suppression and voter dilution determinations under the Act. It outlines that legal standing will be conferred broadly under the Act, and individuals, organizations, or the Attorney General can bring actions to enforce the prohibitions in a court of competent jurisdiction. Plaintiffs are required in most circumstances to give defendants pre-suit notice under the Act, and defendants may prevent litigation by working with the potential plaintiff to implement a remedy to the alleged violation. Subchapter I also establishes a standard for evaluating a claim where a party seeks preliminary relief. The Subchapter also includes remedies that a court of competent jurisdictionis authorized to provide upon a finding of illegal voter suppression or dilution and allows attorneys’ fees for prevailing plaintiff parties in judicial actions and recovery of costs for those who submit a pre-suit notice letter when jurisdictions voluntarily enact changes after receiving said notice letter up to a $ 60,000 cap, adjusted for inflation. When an entity plans to voluntarily adopt a new election policy or practice after the filing of a lawsuit, the entity shall hold at least one public hearing at which members of the public may provide input regarding such draft or proposal. After the adoption of any remedy, the entity must hold at least one public education event during which they explain all changes to elections resulting from the remedy. Subchapter II of the Act requires the Department of Elections (“DOE”) to designate 1 or more languages, other than English, for which assistance will be available in elections for local offices if DOE finds that a significant and substantial need exists for such assistance. A finding of significant and substantial need is mandated when more than 2%, but in no instances fewer than 100, of the citizens of voting age of such jurisdiction speak a particular shared language other than English and are limited English proficient individuals or more than 1,000 of the citizens of voting age of such jurisdiction speak a particular shared language other than English and are limited English proficient individuals. DOE shall distribute to affected jurisdictions and publish annually on its website a list of each local office in which language assistance shall be provided and the languages that assistance will be provided in. The Subchapter requires affected local offices to provide this assistance and outlines the materials that are subject to language assistance. The Subchapter also requires DOE to establish a process, which shall include public comment, whereby electors and impacted organizations may petition DOE to decide that there is significant and substantial need for language assistance in a local office that DOE has not previously determined to have such significant and substantial need. The Subchapter also makes clear that limited English proficient individuals may receive assistance from a person of the voter’s choice when voting equivalent to the allowance given to voters with blindness, disability, or illiteracy. The Subchapter also indicates that individuals, organizations, or the Attorney General may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the Subchapter, and that attorneys’ fees shall be made available to prevailing plaintiff parties. Subchapter III of the Act prevents intimidation, deception, or obstruction of the right to vote. Under the Subchapter, a person, whether acting under color of state law or otherwise, shall not engage in acts of intimidation, deception or obstruction that interfere with any elector’s right to vote and provides guidance regarding activity that would be considered intimidation, deception, or obstruction of the right to vote. Individuals, organizations, or the Attorney General may bring an action to enforce the prohibitions in a court of competent jurisdiction, and upon finding a violation, the court shall implement appropriate remedies that are tailored to remedy the violation. Damages available to a prevailing plaintiff party upon a finding of a violation include nominal damages for any violation and compensatory or punitive damages for any intentional violation. Attorney’s fees shall also be available for prevailing plaintiff parties. Section 4 of the bill declares that the Act is severable.