DIRECTING THE STATE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE AND THE SECRETARY OF HUMAN RESOURCES TO ENGAGE WITH INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS AND OTHER SUPPLY CHAIN TACTICS FOR COST CONTAINMENT OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR STATE EMPLOYEES AND RETIREES’ INSURANCE PROGRAMS.
Summary
This is a Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution No. 7. Like Senate Joint Resolution No. 7, this Substitute directs the State Employees Benefits Committee (SEBC) to utilize specific strategies and policies when interacting and contracting with Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBM) in order to achieve lower cost pharmaceutical drug benefit plans for the State. This Substitute differs from Senate Joint Resolution No. 7 by clarifying that the SEBC has a duty to consider all of the following strategies and policies when negotiating for pharmaceuticals: 1. Drug cost transparency. 2. Formation of an independent Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. 3. Any other supply chain tactics such as a reverse auction or transparency committee. 4. Compacts with other states to negotiate directly with drug manufacturers. 5. Paying no higher price for all drugs negotiated by Medicare. 6. Requiring PBMs disclose administrative expenses for all pharmaceutical drugs. 7. Requiring PBMs bid based on lowest pricing sources, not average wholesale price. 8. Requiring the SEBC be provided all agreements between PBMs and pharmaceutical companies when those agreements are for drugs contracted for on behalf of the SEBC. 9. Performing audits when the SEBC believes it should be entitled to information to achieve transparency or clarity. This Substitute differs from Senate Joint Resolution No. 7 by directing the SEBC to prepare a report by August 1, 2026, to summarize any difficulties in implementing any of these policies and to submit the report to the Governor; the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives, for distribution to all members of the General Assembly; the Director and the Librarian of the Division of Legislative Services; and the Public Archives.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Jul 2025
House Passage
Jun 2025
Signed into Law
Aug 2025
Introduced May 21, 2025
Signed Aug 25, 2025
Floor votes · Senate Jul 1, 2025 · House Jun 30, 2025
How they voted
21–0
Passed
Total votes 21
Jul 1, 2025
D
Democratic15
100% Yea
R
Republican6
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
8
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Aug 25, 2025
Signed into law
Signed by Governor
executive
Jul 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
upper
Jun 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed By House. Votes: 39 YES 1 ABSENT 1 VACANT
lower
Jun 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
Amendment HA 1 to SS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
lower
Jun 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Administration) in House with 5 On Its Merits
lower
Jun 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
Not Worked in Committee
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Not Worked in Committee
upper
May 22, 2025
Introduced
Assigned to Administration Committee in House
lower
May 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed By Senate. Votes: 19 YES 2 ABSENT
upper
May 21, 2025
Introduced
was introduced and adopted in lieu of SJR 7
upper
11 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bryan Townsend
DDemocratic
P
Dave Sokola
DDemocratic
P
Dave Wilson
RRepublican
P
Ed Osienski
DDemocratic
P
Frank Cooke
DDemocratic
P
Jack Walsh
DDemocratic
P
Laura Sturgeon
DDemocratic
P
Marie Pinkney
DDemocratic
P
Melanie Ross Levin
DDemocratic
P
Ray Seigfried
DDemocratic
P
Trey Paradee
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SJR 7
Scope: DE
Hi! I can help you understand SJR 7. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline