SB 271 Delaware Senate · 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026)

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 18 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PHARMACY BENEFITS MANAGERS.

Summary
This Act strengthens procedural protections for pharmacies, pharmacists, and consumers related to regulation of a pharmacy benefits manager by doing all of the following: Adds definitions for the terms “chronic or long-term condition”, “net amount”, “purchaser”, “recoupment”, “similarly situated contracted pharmacy”, and “wholesale invoice audit.” Applies audit notice requirements uniformly and ensures access to an appropriate point of contact. Requires a pharmacy benefits manager to provide a list of records that the auditing entity seeks to audit at least 5 business days before an audit. Limits activities to once every 12 months and sets standards for wholesale invoice audits. Ensures audit costs are borne solely by the pharmacy benefits manager. Clarifies that a pharmacy can appeal the amount of any reimbursement and that a contracted pharmacy’s representative can take actions and receive notices related to appeals on behalf of a pharmacy. Extends pharmacies’ ability to appeal from 10 days to 40 days to account for entities that complete retroactive billing. When an appeal is denied, requires the parties to provide a detailed reason for the denial and specific information about how the pharmacy can appeal the denial to the Department of Insurance. Prohibits retaliation by a pharmacy benefits manager when a pharmacist or pharmacy discloses information to a government agency or during a proceeding if the person who disclosed the information had reasonable cause to believe that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law. Requires that a pharmacy benefits manager must provide at least 60 days’ notice before amending a contract with a pharmacy or pharmacist. Clarifies that the prohibition against spread pricing applies to all purchasers contracting with pharmacy benefits managers. Changes the reporting requirements for rebates so that pharmacy benefits managers must file the required reports annually instead of quarterly. This change will reduce the amount of incorrect or unclear reporting because rebates are aggregated and reported at the end of the period of time under each contract. Amends national drug acquisition cost compliance to refer to the date of service. Prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from unit-of-use requirements inconsistent with smallest package size availability and manufacturer recommendations. Requires that pharmacy benefit managers may not require pharmacies to dispense therapeutically equivalent or alternative drugs that cost the enrollee more out of pocket than the prescribed drug except for medical reasons. Ensures that enrollee-identifiable or prescriber-identifiable information is not transferred to or shared with affiliated pharmacies for any commercial purpose other than those defined. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
House Passage
Jun 2026
Governor
Introduced Mar 26, 2026 Last action Jun 24, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

SA 1 to SB 271 Bill Text · 13 edits
MAJOR
The bill was transformed from a narrow Senate Amendment 1 (which only clarified audit applicability exceptions, made minor word deletions, and set a 6-month effective date) into a comprehensive PBM regulation act covering audits, appeals, anti-retaliation, prior authorization, reporting, and prohibited practices. The final bill adds extensive procedural protections for pharmacies and pharmacists, new definitions, and multiple new regulatory requirements that were not present in the amendment version.
SCOPE

The bill expanded from a single narrow amendment to a full act amending six subchapters of Title 18, Chapter 33A (PBMs), covering definitions, audit procedures, appeals, retaliation protections, prior authorization, reporting, and prohibited practices.

Sponsors expanded from Senator Sokola alone to include Representative Burns and additional senators (Sturgeon, Hoffner, Walsh, Hocker, Seigfried) and representatives (Morrison, Romer, Snyder-Hall, Wilson-Anton, Lambert, Griffith).

REQUIREMENT

New audit procedure requirements: 14-day notice before on-site audits, audits involving clinical judgment must be conducted by or in consultation with a licensed pharmacist, pharmacies audited under same standards as similarly situated pharmacies, range of prescription numbers provided at least 5 business days before audit, PBM must provide a contact method for questions, and no more than one audit per pharmacy every 12 months.

Comprehensive appeals process: appeal window extended from 10 to 40 calendar days, PBM must respond within 10 days of an appeal, detailed denial reasons required, notice of right to appeal to the Department of Insurance with specific language, and if an appeal is granted the PBM must adjust reimbursement retroactively without requiring the pharmacy to reverse and rebill.

Prior authorization requirements: PBM may not require prior authorization for 72-hour emergency supplies of noncontrolled substances; prior authorization forms must include a question about chronic or long-term conditions; if indicated as life-necessary, reauthorization may not be requested more frequently than every 12 months; PBMs must provide lists of therapeutically equivalent alternatives.

New prohibited practices: PBMs may not amend contracts without at least 60 days notice; may not require pharmacists to break open unit-of-use items beyond manufacturer recommendations; may not require dispensing of therapeutically equivalent drugs that cost the enrollee more out-of-pocket unless for medical reasons; may not transfer or share prescription information with affiliated pharmacies for commercial purposes other than reimbursement, formulary compliance, or utilization review.

National average drug acquisition cost compliance now refers to the price in effect on the date of service (rather than an unspecified reference point), with wholesale acquisition cost as a fallback when NADAC is unavailable.

FISCAL

Audit costs must be borne solely by the pharmacy benefits manager. PBMs may not impose fees or pass audit-related costs to the audited pharmacy or pharmacist.

Reporting requirements changed from quarterly to annual (by March 31) for PBM revenue sources, rebate distributions, and amounts paid for pharmacy goods and services.

ENFORCEMENT

Anti-retaliation provision: PBMs may not retaliate against pharmacists or pharmacies for disclosing information to courts, administrative proceedings, legislative committees, or government agencies when there is reasonable cause to believe the information evidences a violation of law. Retaliatory actions include contract cancellation, restriction, refusal to renew, or refusal to offer a contract.

Commissioner-level appeal process: if a PBM denies an appeal and the pharmacy files with the Commissioner, the Commissioner reviews the PBM's compensation program, can deny or grant the appeal, and pricing information collected is confidential. The non-prevailing party pays Department costs.

TIMELINE

Effective date changed from 6 months after enactment to contracts entered into, renewed, amended, or extended after December 31, 2026.

DEFINITION

Spread pricing definition changed to apply to all 'purchasers' rather than only 'health benefit plans,' broadening the scope of the prohibition. New definitions added for recoupment, similarly situated contracted pharmacy, wholesale invoice audit, chronic or long-term condition, net amount, and purchaser.

Floor votes · Senate Jun 9, 2026 · House Jun 24, 2026

How they voted

200
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 21
Jun 9, 2026
D Democratic15
14 Yea 1
93% Yea
R Republican6
6 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT
lower
Jun 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce) in House with 1 Favorable, 9 On Its Merits
lower
Jun 10, 2026
Introduced
Assigned to Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce Committee in House
lower
Jun 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendment SA 1 to SB 271 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Introduced
Amendment SA 1 to SB 271 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
upper
May 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Executive) in Senate with 6 On Its Merits
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Introduced
Introduced and Assigned to Executive Committee in Senate
upper
12 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors