SB 213 Delaware Senate · 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026)

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 16 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO HOSPITAL BUDGET REVIEW.

Summary
The Hospital Budget Review Act, House Substitute No. 2 to House Bill No. 350 (152nd General Assembly), enacted in 2024, ("HB 350") created the Diamond State Hospital Cost Review Board (“Board”) in an effort to bring greater transparency and accountability to hospital spending in Delaware. HB 350 requires hospitals to submit their budgets to the Board annually, disclose financial and operational information, and comply with the State’s healthcare spending benchmark. HB 350 also authorizes the Board to prospectively approve or modify hospital budgets and imposes penalties for non-compliance. Shortly after HB 350’s enactment, ChristianaCare filed suit in the Court of Chancery, alleging principally that the prospective budget approval and modification authority granted to the Board violates the Delaware Constitution. The litigation raised broader constitutional and policy questions about the balance between State oversight of health care spending and the autonomy of private, nonprofit hospitals. On September 30, 2025, the State and ChristianaCare signed an agreement pausing ChristianaCare’s lawsuit and setting forth the framework for this Act that, if enacted, will fully resolve the case. Under the agreement, the State admitted no fault. This Act incorporates the each of the terms of that agreement. HB 350 has 4 main components. First, hospitals must present detailed budget information annually to the Board. Second, the Board must determine whether the hospital has complied with the State’s healthcare spending benchmark. Third, if the hospital misses the benchmark, it must submit a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for approval by the Board. Fourth, if the hospital fails to submit an approved PIP or achieve its objectives, then the Board may prospectively approve or modify the hospital’s budget. This Act addresses constitutional concerns by eliminating the Board’s ability to approve or modify hospital budgets, while preserving the first 3 components of HB 350 with certain modifications and enhancements. First, under this Act, hospitals still must present detailed budget information to the Board each year. However, the Board will evaluate hospitals based on actual expenditure and revenue information for the most recent year, rather than prospectively approving future budgets. As with HB 350, hospitals must report financial information, including costs of operations, revenues, assets, liabilities, and expenditures, scope and volume of service information, and other information deemed relevant by the Board. This Act also requires hospitals to outline changes in year-over-year results and describe the actions it will take in the coming year to meet the benchmark, and further requires the Board to adopt a Uniform Reporting Manual for Budget Submissions to ensure the consistency of information provided by hospitals. Hospitals must provide labor costs by units of service and budget category, salary reporting is narrowed to officers, directors, key employees, and highest-compensated employees, and certain categories, such as payer contract information and three-year capital budgets, are no longer required. Second, HB 350 required the Board to determine annually whether each hospital has met the State’s healthcare spending benchmark. That requirement remains, but this Act expressly requires the Board to issue written findings of fact and determinations as to whether each hospital: (1) has met the benchmark; and, if applicable, (2) has satisfied the elements of the hospital’s Benchmark Compliance Plan (BCP), which replaces the PIP; and (3) is participating in a Meaningful Cost Containment Arrangement (MCCA). Further, the Board may also make policy recommendations to the Delaware Health Care Commission or the General Assembly regarding how to better align hospital budgets with the benchmark, while promoting efficient and economic operations and maintaining the ability of hospitals to meet hospitals’ financial obligations and to provide quality care. Third, beginning in 2027, hospitals that fail to meet the benchmark must submit a BCP for the Board’s approval. As with HB 350, if the BCP does not meet the criteria established by the Board, the Board may require the hospital to amend and resubmit the BCP. If a BCP is required, the Board will examine and determine in writing the following year whether the hospital has satisfied the BCP’s elements. However, if the hospital demonstrates that it is subject to an MCCA, then the hospital is not required to submit to the BCP process for that year. MCCAs are contracts between hospitals and payers (including, in some cases, federal or state governments) that are designed to reduce healthcare costs by holding the hospital financially accountable for controlling healthcare spend for a specific population – including downside risk. However, even if a hospital has an MCCA and therefore is not required to adopt a BCP, it still must present its detailed budget information to the Board every year so that the Board may determine whether it has met the benchmark. A hospital’s adoption of an MCCA does not exempt it from that process, only the requirement that it adopt a BCP—and only for one year. Civil penalties of up to $500,000 for knowingly failing to comply with reporting standards remain in effect.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Jan 2026
House Passage
Jan 2026
Signed into Law
Jan 2026
Introduced Dec 30, 2025 Signed Jan 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

SA 1 to SB 213 Bill Text · 11 edits
MAJOR
SB 213 was fundamentally restructured from a set of amendments to a complete rewrite of Delaware's Hospital Budget Review Act, driven by a September 2025 settlement with ChristianaCare that resolved a constitutional challenge. The most significant change is the elimination of the Board's authority to prospectively approve or modify hospital budgets, which was the core constitutional concern. In its place, the bill preserves annual budget reporting, benchmark compliance determinations, and a renamed 'Benchmark Compliance Plan' process (replacing the Performance Improvement Plan), while adding a new exemption for hospitals with Meaningful Cost Containment Arrangements.
SCOPE

The Board's authority to prospectively approve or modify hospital budgets was eliminated. Section 9955, which allowed the Board to impose modified budgets on hospitals that failed their Performance Improvement Plans, was repealed and replaced with a less intrusive framework.

TIMELINE

The requirement for hospitals to submit compliance plans when they exceed the spending benchmark now begins in 2027 instead of 2026, giving hospitals an additional year before this enforcement mechanism activates.

DEFINITION

New definitions were added for 'Meaningful Cost Containment Arrangement,' 'Medicare or Medicaid Global Budget Arrangement' (requiring coverage of at least 50% of historical patient volumes and at least 3% of net patient revenue at risk), 'Substantial Financial Downside Risk Arrangement' (requiring total annual costs of at least 3% of net patient revenue, minimum 10% downside risk to the hospital, and for hospitals over $1 billion in budget, at least 5,000 covered patient lives), and 'Total annual costs.'

ELIGIBILITY

Hospitals participating in a Meaningful Cost Containment Arrangement are exempt from the Benchmark Compliance Plan process for that year, though they must still submit their detailed budget information to the Board annually. The exemption applies only to the BCP requirement, not to reporting obligations.

REQUIREMENT

The 'Performance Improvement Plan' was renamed to 'Benchmark Compliance Plan' throughout the bill. The resubmission process was changed: if the Board finds a plan deficient, it must provide written guidance and the hospital has 30 days from receipt to address each deficiency and resubmit.

The Board is now required to issue written findings of fact and determinations on whether each hospital met the spending benchmark, satisfied its Benchmark Compliance Plan elements, and whether it qualifies for MCCA exemption. The Board may also make policy recommendations to the Delaware Health Care Commission and legislative health committees.

Hospital reporting requirements were adjusted: a new narrative requirement was added requiring hospitals to outline year-over-year changes and actions to meet the benchmark; payer contract information was narrowed to payments consistent with 45 C.F.R. Part 180 public disclosure rules; salary reporting was narrowed to officers, directors, key employees, and highest-compensated employees as disclosed on IRS Form 990; and a Uniform Reporting Manual must be adopted by the Board for consistency.

Hospitals must now submit audited financial statements to the Board within 30 days of finalization, beginning with statements for fiscal year 2023. The Board must also promulgate a Uniform Reporting Manual providing uniform definitions and submission criteria for budget reporting categories.

ENFORCEMENT

New enforcement provisions were added: if a hospital subject to budget approval fails to maintain its approved budget, the Board may factor excess net revenues into the following year's budget, or allow the hospital to retain surplus funds if achieved while staying within budget or generated primarily by volume exceeding projections. A notice and hearing requirement was added before penalty orders can be issued.

Board voting rules were clarified: four voting members constitute a quorum, and specific actions (budget approval, enforcement actions, regulation adoption, written findings on MCCA, and BCP approval) require the affirmative vote of a majority of all voting members rather than just those present.

TECHNICAL

A severability clause was added as Section 8, providing that if any provision is held invalid, the remaining provisions continue in effect.

Floor votes · Senate Jan 20, 2026 · House Jan 29, 2026

How they voted

210
Passed
Total votes 21
Jan 20, 2026
D Democratic15
15 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican6
6 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
9
Key actions
6
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Jan 30, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by Governor
executive
Jan 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed By House. Votes: 33 YES 7 NO 1 NOT VOTING
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Administration) in House with 2 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Introduced
Assigned to Administration Committee in House
lower
Jan 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
upper
Jan 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendment SA 1 to SB 213 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
upper
Jan 19, 2026
Introduced
Amendment SA 1 to SB 213 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
upper
Jan 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Executive) in Senate with 2 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits
upper
Dec 30, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Assigned to Executive Committee in Senate
upper
6 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors