HB 145 Delaware House · 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026)

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.

Summary
Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search. This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Jul 2026
Governor
Introduced Apr 14, 2026 Last action Jul 1, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

HA 1 to HS 1 for HB 145 Bill Text · 10 edits
MAJOR
The bill was completely rewritten from a narrow amendment that expanded the list of crimes eligible for reverse-keyword court orders into a comprehensive privacy protection act that broadly prohibits both reverse-keyword court orders and voluntary reverse-keyword requests by government entities. The only exception allows reverse-keyword court orders for Class A violent felonies, and even then only if the search returns 5 or fewer hits; if more than 5 hits result, only the count is reported and identities are not disclosed. New enforcement provisions add evidence suppression, mandatory notice to affected individuals, civil remedies including attorney's fees, mandatory data deletion, and disciplinary action for violators.
SCOPE

The bill shifted from expanding the list of crimes eligible for reverse-keyword orders (HA 1 added roughly 20+ specific felonies) to broadly prohibiting all reverse-keyword court orders and requests, with a narrow exception limited to Class A violent felonies only.

A new prohibition on reverse-keyword requests (voluntary compliance) was added, banning government entities from requesting, purchasing, or reviewing data obtained through voluntary disclosure in the absence of a court order.

A new anti-circumvention provision was added prohibiting government entities from seeking assistance from federal or out-of-state agencies to obtain information they would be barred from directly seeking under this section.

The expanded list of specific crimes eligible for reverse-keyword orders (including strangulation, assault in the first degree, promoting suicide, various sexual offenses, kidnapping, arson, burglary, robbery, extortion, child exploitation, stalking, and others) was removed entirely and replaced with the single category of Class A violent felonies.

REQUIREMENT

A new 5-search-hit threshold was added: if a reverse-keyword query for a Class A violent felony returns more than 5 hits, the entity must report only the number of hits without disclosing any identities, and the government may not seek additional information from that search.

A new mandatory data deletion requirement was added: any data acquired in violation of the section must be immediately deleted and destroyed.

The sealing requirement from HA 1 (that returns must be kept under seal and unrelated evidence destroyed unless potentially exculpatory) was removed and replaced with broader suppression and deletion provisions.

ENFORCEMENT

A new evidence suppression rule was added: any record or information obtained in violation of the section, and any evidence derived from it, is inadmissible in any proceeding. The provision explicitly rejects attenuation, inevitable discovery, and re-obtained evidence exceptions.

New notice and civil remedy provisions were added requiring written notice to affected persons, allowing them to seek injunctive relief, declaratory relief, a writ of mandamus, and reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

A new disciplinary action provision was added making any officer, employee, or agent of the state or political subdivision who violates the section subject to appropriate disciplinary action.

Floor votes · House May 19, 2026

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Jul 1, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed By Senate. Votes: 11 YES 4 NO 6 ABSENT
upper
Jun 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
upper
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
upper
May 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed By House. Votes: 24 YES 12 NO 5 ABSENT
lower
May 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
lower
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
lower
May 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 1 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits
lower
Apr 14, 2026
Introduced
Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 145, and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
lower
6 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors