AN ACT CONCERNING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ADDRESS MILITARY INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE.
SB 278 amends Connecticut's protective order laws to better address interpersonal violence involving military personnel. It requires applicants to disclose if the respondent (the person against whom the order is sought) holds a firearm permit or possesses firearms, which helps courts assess immediate risks. If firearms are involved, courts must schedule a hearing within seven days for emergency orders (instead of 14 days) and must consider a report including military protective orders, criminal history, and risk assessments. This applies directly to Connecticut residents seeking protection from military members, ensuring their safety concerns are addressed with timely, evidence-based court decisions.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Mar 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Raised Bill
→
VA Joint Favorable Substitute Change of Reference
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was converted from a 'Raised Bill' to a 'Substitute Bill' after committee review, indicating it has been amended. The substantive changes include clarifying the timeline for hearings when a court issues an emergency order, adding specific protections for animals, and introducing a mechanism to keep an applicant's home address confidential if revealing it would endanger their safety.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on protective orders, but the applicability of hearing timelines was refined for emergency situations, and new protections were added for animal owners and applicants seeking privacy.
TIMELINE
The deadline for holding a hearing was adjusted to seven days when an emergency order is issued, provided the applicant holds certain permits or firearms.
ENFORCEMENT
New provisions allow courts to issue orders specifically protecting animals owned by the applicant from injury or threats.
REQUIREMENT
A new option was added allowing applicants to request that their home address not be disclosed on public records if revealing it would jeopardize their health or safety.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Joint Favorable Substitute Change of Reference JUD
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Committee
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Veterans' and Military Affairs
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Aimee Berger-Girvalo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 278
Scope: CT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 278. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline