Deceptive Trade Practice Significant Impact Standard
Summary
The bill establishes that certain evidence that a person has engaged in an unfair or deceptive trade practice constitutes a significant impact to the public. The bill also clarifies that a deceptive trade practice claim cannot be based solely on a claim that a person breached a contract or engaged in negligence or on a claim for damages based on the rendering of professional services, unless the claim for damages involves an allegation of a material misrepresentation of fact, a failure to disclose material information, or an action that cannot be characterized as providing advice, judgment, or opinion.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Bill status
in committee
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2025
Last action Apr 1, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Engrossed (03/28/2025)
→
PA1 (03/12/2025)
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to remove language that specifically listed vulnerable populations (seniors, veterans, military members, disabled individuals, and pregnant people) as the only ones who could bring consumer protection claims. The amendment also replaced detailed eligibility criteria with broader language allowing any person to pursue claims, while clarifying that certain claims (like simple breach of contract or negligence) do not automatically constitute deceptive trade practices unless additional misconduct is alleged.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed from targeting specific vulnerable populations to allowing all persons to pursue claims, while adding clarifications about what types of claims qualify as deceptive trade practices.
ELIGIBILITY
Removed specific list of vulnerable populations (seniors, veterans, military service members, gold star military spouses, people with disabilities, and pregnant individuals) that were previously defined as 'persons particularly targeted by deceptive acts or practices'.
Changed eligibility criteria from requiring plaintiffs to be specifically targeted vulnerable populations to allowing any person to pursue claims under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.
DEFINITION
Added clarifying language stating that breach of contract claims, negligence claims, and professional service advice claims do not automatically constitute deceptive trade practices unless additional conduct is alleged.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 1, 2025
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
Apr 1, 2025
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
2
Committee
1
Apr 1, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0)
senate
Mar 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
upper
4 primary · 16 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Brianna Titone
DDemocratic
P
Javier Mabrey
DDemocratic
P
Julie Gonzales
DDemocratic
P
Mike Weissman
DDemocratic
Co
Cathy Kipp
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Kolker
DDemocratic
Co
Elizabeth Velasco
DDemocratic
Co
Emily Sirota
DDemocratic
Co
Iman Jodeh
DDemocratic
Co
Jennifer Bacon
DDemocratic
Co
Jenny Willford
DDemocratic
Co
Kyle Brown
DDemocratic
Co
Lisa Cutter
DDemocratic
Co
LG
Lorena García
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 25-157
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand SB 25-157. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline