Legally Protected Health-Care Activity Protections
Summary
The act clarifies that requirements for out-of-state telehealth providers do not alter or limit the rights and protections afforded to a person concerning a legally protected health-care activity. Current law requires a prescription drug label to include the name of the prescribing practitioner. At the practitioner's request, the act authorizes a prescription label for mifepristone, misoprostol, and the generic alternatives to those prescriptions to include only the name of the prescribing health-care practice instead of the name of the practitioner, provided the practitioner includes the name of the health-care practice on the paper or electronic form of the prescription. The act requires any person requesting a subpoena to affirm under penalty of perjury that the subpoena: Is not related to, and any information obtained will not be used in, any investigation or proceeding that seeks to impose civil or criminal liability or professional sanctions against a person or entity that engaged in or attempted or intended to engage in a legally protected health-care activity or that provided insurance coverage for gender-affirming health-care services or reproductive health care; or Is related to such an investigation or proceeding, but the investigation or proceeding is brought under tort law or contract law by the person who engaged in or attempted or intended to engage in a legally protected health-care activity, gender-affirming health-care services, or reproductive health care, and is actionable in an equivalent or similar manner under Colorado law. If a person or entity brings an out-of-state civil or criminal action, or attempts to enforce any order or judgment issued in connection with an action, against another person or entity for engaging in or attempting or intending to engage in a legally protected health-care activity or for providing insurance coverage for gender-affirming health-care services or reproductive health care, the person or entity subject to the out-of-state civil or criminal action has a private right of action against the person or entity and may institute a civil action in district court within 6 years after the date the out-of-state action is commenced or enforcement is attempted. Current law authorizes a private person to arrest a person without a warrant upon reasonable information that the person is charged in another state with a crime punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. The act creates an exception if the person is charged in another state for engaging in a legally protected health-care activity in Colorado. Current law prohibits a public agency from expending government resources or providing information or data in furtherance of any out-of-state investigation or proceeding seeking to impose civil or criminal liability or professional sanction upon a person or entity for engaging in a legally protected health-care activity. The act expands the prohibition to include public entities, which include state and local governments, and a person or entity licensed or regulated by the state. The act grants the attorney general the authority to enforce the provisions of the act. The act prohibits the department of public health and environment (CDPHE) from collecting a patient's name, date of birth, address, employer, spouse's name, or parent's or legal guardian's name, or the city or town where the termination of pregnancy occurred, as part of any required reporting of induced terminations of pregnancy. Reports of induced terminations of pregnancy collected by CDPHE must only be used for compilation of statistical reports, must not be incorporated into the official records of the office of the state registrar of vital statistics, and are confidential. The state registrar is required to dispose of any reports of induced terminations of pregnancy when all statistical processing of the reports is complete. A person who releases or discloses confidential information related to reporting of induced terminations of pregnancy commits a data privacy breach. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Apr 2025
Introduced Feb 5, 2025
Signed Apr 24, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons
What changed between versions
Revised (04/04/2025)
→
PA1 (02/13/2025)
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill version was re-published as a pre-amended draft rather than a revised version, indicating it has not yet been adopted by the legislature. The substantive policy content regarding prescription labeling for mifepristone and misoprostol remains unchanged from the previous version, with no new amendments added.
TECHNICAL
Removed 'REVISED' status header and replaced with 'PREAMENDED' status, indicating this is an unofficial version with committee amendments not yet adopted.
Removed several sponsor names (Coleman, Exum, Mullica, Roberts) from the Senate sponsorship list.
Removed 'Amended 2nd Reading' status and associated dates from the bill summary section.
Changed the bill summary date from February 24, 2025 to February 21, 2025, and removed '3rd Reading Unamended' designation.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 24, 2025 · House Apr 6, 2025
How they voted
20–10
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 33
Feb 24, 2025
D
Democratic21
95% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Apr 24, 2025
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Apr 8, 2025
Introduced
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
upper
Apr 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Feb 26, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
4 primary · 55 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FW
Faith Winter
DDemocratic
P
Junie Joseph
DDemocratic
P
Karen McCormick
DDemocratic
P
Lisa Cutter
DDemocratic
Co
Alex Valdez
DDemocratic
Co
Amy Paschal
DDemocratic
Co
Andy Boesenecker
DDemocratic
Co
Brianna Titone
DDemocratic
Co
Cathy Kipp
DDemocratic
Co
Cecelia Espenoza
DDemocratic
Co
Chad Clifford
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Kolker
DDemocratic
Co
Dafna Michaelson Jenet
DDemocratic
Co
Dylan Roberts
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 25-129
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand SB 25-129. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline