Clarifications To 48-hour Bond Hearing Requirement
Summary
Current law requires an individual who is in jail to be brought before a judge for a bond hearing within 48 hours of arriving at the jail. The act clarifies the circumstances when the 48-hour requirement does not apply when the individual is unable to attend court. When an arrestee is unable to attend court within the 48-hour requirement, the sheriff shall create a list of those individuals, the date of the individual's arrest, and the location where the individual is in custody. The sheriff shall document the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, and the efforts to abate a delay caused by an emergency. As soon as an emergency has sufficiently abated, the act requires the sheriff to make the in-custody arrestee available to appear. The act also clarifies that the 48-hour requirement applies regardless of whether: The individual is held in custody in a jurisdiction other than the one that issues the arrest warrant; Money bond was previously set ex parte; or The in-custody arrestee did not appear for a first appearance. APPROVED by Governor April 20, 2023 EFFECTIVE October 1, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2023
Committee Review
Mar 2023
House Passage
Feb 2023
Senate Passage
Mar 2023
Signed into Law
Apr 2023
Introduced Jan 31, 2023
Signed Apr 20, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Mar 24, 2023 · House Feb 22, 2023
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 30
Mar 24, 2023
D
Democratic21
85% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
5
Apr 20, 2023
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Mar 29, 2023
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
lower
Mar 28, 2023
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
lower
Mar 27, 2023
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
lower
Mar 26, 2023
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
lower
Mar 25, 2023
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
lower
Mar 24, 2023
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
Mar 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Feb 23, 2023
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Feb 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Feb 15, 2023
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Jan 31, 2023
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BG
Bob Gardner
RRepublican
P
Robert Rodriguez
DDemocratic
P
RB
Rod Bockenfeld
RRepublican
P
Steven Woodrow
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 23-1151
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 23-1151. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline