Competency To Proceed And Restoration To Competency
Summary
Under current law, in a dispute over a defendant's competency, a party may request a second evaluation of the defendant. The act requires that if a second evaluation is completed and restoration is ordered, the court shall make the second evaluation available to the department of human services (department). If the court finds that the competency report provided by the department does not meet statutory requirements, the act permits a defendant to be placed in the department's custody for an inpatient competency evaluation. Under current law, when a defendant is in custody on a misdemeanor, petty offense, or traffic offense and the defendant is found incompetent to proceed, there is a presumption that the court will enter a personal recognizance bond. The act also creates a presumption that the court will order outpatient restoration services. If the court denies a personal recognizance bond, the court shall notify the department of the specific facts and findings it relied upon in the order for restoration treatment. The department is allowed to offer assistance to an out-of-state provider providing restoration services to a defendant living outside Colorado. The requirement to opine on whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will be restored to competency and remain competent with the use of medication or not remain competent without the use of forced medication is eliminated. After the court has conducted at least 4 competency reviews, the act requires the court to conduct a competency review every 91 days. The court is required to dismiss the defendant's case if there is not a substantial probability that the defendant will be restored to competency in the reasonably foreseeable future. The act appropriates: $28,562,828 from the economic recovery and relief fund cash fund to the department for use by the office of behavioral health for inpatient bed capacity; and $800,000 from the behavioral and mental health cash fund to the department to contract for a feasibility study of renovating a facility in Adams county to provide inpatient beds for competency services.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2022
Committee Review
May 2022
House Passage
Apr 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Signed into Law
Jun 2022
Introduced Apr 18, 2022
Signed Jun 2, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2022 · House Apr 29, 2022
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
May 6, 2022
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Jun 2, 2022
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
May 6, 2022
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
May 5, 2022
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
May 3, 2022
Committee
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
upper
Apr 29, 2022
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Apr 29, 2022
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Apr 28, 2022
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Apr 26, 2022
Committee
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
lower
Apr 18, 2022
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BG
Bob Gardner
RRepublican
P
CH
Chris Hansen
DDemocratic
P
Judy Amabile
DDemocratic
P
Matt Soper
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 22-1386
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 22-1386. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline