Privacy Protections For Human Services Workers
Summary
Under current law, it is unlawful for a person to make available on the internet personal information of a law enforcement official (official) or child abuse or neglect caseworker (caseworker), or the official's or caseworker's family if the dissemination of the personal information poses an imminent and serious threat to the official's or caseworker's safety or the safety of his or her family. The act replaces the definition of "caseworker" in statute with a new definition of "human services worker" to include state and county employees, including county attorneys and contractors who are engaged in duties relating to the following matters and who have contact with the public regarding these duties: Investigating allegations of child abuse or neglect pursuant to article 3 of title 19; Investigating allegations of mistreatment of an at-risk adult pursuant to article 3.1 of title 26; Establishing, modifying, and enforcing child support orders pursuant to article 13 of title 26; and Determining eligibility for or investigating fraud in public programs established in article 2 of title 26. "Human services worker" also includes employees of juvenile detention facilities who have contact with juveniles. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2020
Committee Review
Mar 2020
House Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Mar 2020
Signed into Law
Mar 2020
Introduced Jan 8, 2020
Signed Mar 24, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Mar 6, 2020 · House Mar 10, 2020
How they voted
23–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 27
Mar 6, 2020
D
Democratic15
93% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Mar 24, 2020
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Mar 10, 2020
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (31-0-3)
house
Mar 10, 2020
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
lower
Mar 6, 2020
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-0-4)
senate
Mar 6, 2020
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
lower
Mar 2, 2020
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Feb 3, 2020
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Jan 8, 2020
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BG
Bob Gardner
RRepublican
P
JS
Jonathan Singer
DDemocratic
P
Pete Lee
DDemocratic
P
Terri Carver
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 20-1052
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 20-1052. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline