Additional Revenues Urban Renewal Projects
Summary
Under current law, in connection with the use of a special fund (fund) of an urban renewal authority (authority) to collect the increment used to finance urban renewal projects, any additional revenues received by a municipality, county, special district, or school district (collectively, taxing entity) resulting because the voters have authorized the taxing entity to retain and spend such money under the TABOR requirements of the state constitution after the creation of the fund or as a result of an increase in the property tax mill levy approved by the voters of the taxing entity after the creation of the fund, to the extent the total mill levy of any taxing entity exceeds the respective mill levy in effect at the time of approval or substantial modification of the urban renewal plan, are not included in the amount of the increment that is allocated to and, when collected, paid into the special fund. Under the bill, such additional revenues that have been received because of the 2 specified forms of voter-approved revenue changes are restricted from being pledged by an authority for the payment of any bonds of, or any loans or advances to, or any indebtedness incurred by the authority without the consent of the relevant taxing entity. To the extent the authority has received a certain notification specified in the bill, such additional revenues shall then be promptly repaid by the authority to the municipality or other taxing entity. The bill requires the authority to be notified of the amount of additional revenues and the calculations used in computing the amount by the applicable municipality or other taxing entity prior to making repayment and, in any event, not later than February 1 in each fiscal year following the year in which a voter-approved revenue increase has taken effect. The bill permits an authority and a municipality or any other taxing entity to negotiate for the purpose of entering into an agreement on the issues of the amount of repayment, the mechanics of how repayment of the additional revenues will be accomplished, a method for resolving disputes regarding the amount of repayment, and whether the municipality or taxing entity will waive the repayment requirement, singularly or in combination, and are further authorized to enter into an intergovernmental agreement regarding any of these issues. (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.) , Read More
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2018
Committee Review
May 2018
Senate Passage
Apr 2018
House Passage
May 2018
Signed into Law
May 2018
Introduced Apr 16, 2018
Signed May 30, 2018
Floor votes · House May 3, 2018
How they voted
53–0
Passed
Total votes 53
May 3, 2018
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
2
May 30, 2018
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
May 3, 2018
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (53-0)
house
May 2, 2018
Committee
House Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Apr 26, 2018
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Finance
lower
Apr 24, 2018
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Finance Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Apr 16, 2018
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance
upper
3 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Beth Martinez Humenik
RRepublican
P
Matt Gray
DDemocratic
P
Polly Lawrence
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 18-248
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand SB 18-248. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline