Motor Vehicle Dealers And Manufacturers
Summary
Current law prohibits a motor vehicle manufacturer (manufacturer) from requiring a motor vehicle dealer (dealer) to substantially alter a facility or premises if the manufacturer required it within the last 7 years at a cost set in statute based on the type of dealer. Section 1 of the bill extends this prohibition to 10 years. Section 1 also prohibits a manufacturer from: Selling a similarly equipped motor vehicle to one dealer at a lower price than to another dealer; Requiring or enforcing a contract giving the manufacturer a right of first refusal or an option to purchase the dealership; and Using an unreasonable, arbitrary, unfair, or surprise performance standard in determining a dealer's compliance with a franchise agreement. Section 2 repeals a provision that gives a dealer a right of first refusal for new franchises when the dealer was terminated due to the insolvency of the manufacturer. Section 2 also authorizes a dealer to sue in court to contest a manufacturer adding or moving a dealership to a market with a current dealer when this action would materially and adversely affect the dealer or the public. Such an action may currently be done administratively. Procedures are set for the civil action and an administrative hearing. Standards are set for determining the outcome. A prevailing party may get attorney fees and costs. Section 3 authorizes a dealer to sue a manufacturer in court to contest whether a termination was for just cause or for failing to provide notice of a termination. Such an action may currently be done administratively. The current process for staying the termination is strengthened. The manufacturer has the burden of proof. A prevailing dealer may get attorney fees and costs. Section 4 requires a manufacturer, when the manufacturer requires the dealer to stop selling a used motor vehicle due to a technical mechanical issue, to provide parts and a solution within 30 days or to provide compensation to the dealer. Standards are set for eligibility and payment.(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2017
Committee Review
May 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
House Passage
May 2017
Signed into Law
Jun 2017
Introduced Apr 21, 2017
Signed Jun 5, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Jun 5, 2017
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
May 9, 2017
Introduced
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
legislature
May 4, 2017
Committee
House Committee on Business Affairs and Labor Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
legislature
May 2, 2017
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs and Labor
legislature
Apr 26, 2017
Committee
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
legislature
Apr 21, 2017
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
legislature
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 17-298
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand SB 17-298. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline