Limited Applicability Of St. Jude's Co. Water Case
Summary
In the case of St. Jude's Co. v. Roaring Fork Club, LLC, 351 P.3d 442 (Colo. 2015) ( St. Jude's Co. ), the Colorado supreme court held that direct diversions of water from a river to a private ditch for aesthetic, recreational, and piscatorial purposes on private property, without impoundment, are not beneficial uses of water under Colorado water law. The bill provides that the decision in the St. Jude's Co. case interpreting section 37-92-103 (4) does not apply to previously decreed absolute and conditional water rights or claims pending as of July 15, 2015. The interpretation of section 37-92-103 (4) in St. Jude's Co. applies only to direct-flow appropriations, without storage, filed after July 15, 2015, for water diverted from a surface stream or tributary groundwater by a private entity for private aesthetic, recreational, and piscatorial purposes.(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Apr 2017
House Passage
Apr 2017
Senate Passage
Apr 2017
Signed into Law
May 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed May 25, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Amendments
1
May 25, 2017
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Apr 27, 2017
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
legislature
Apr 20, 2017
Committee
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources, & Energy Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
legislature
Apr 7, 2017
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture, Natural Resources, & Energy
legislature
Mar 13, 2017
Committee
House Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
legislature
Feb 17, 2017
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources
legislature
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Sonnenberg
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 17-1190
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 17-1190. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline