photo radar enforcement; civil penalty
This bill changes Arizona's photo radar enforcement rules for traffic violations like speeding or red-light running. Drivers who receive a violation notice from a photo enforcement system do not have to identify the driver or respond to the notice. The maximum civil penalty is capped at $75, and the violation cannot result in driver license suspension, higher insurance rates, or affect insurance renewals. Law enforcement must review evidence before issuing citations, and photo enforcement companies cannot determine if a violation occurred.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
House Passage
Jun 2026
Vetoed
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 3, 2026
Vetoed Jun 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
House Engrossed Version (06/11/2026)
→
Senate Engrossed Version (02/26/2026)
·
4 edits
·
Feb 26, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was amended to shift its focus from general traffic enforcement and officer training to specifically addressing civil traffic violations. The most significant change is the removal of a provision that required a portion of civil penalty fines to be deposited into a peace officer training equipment fund, meaning future fines from photo enforcement will no longer contribute to that specific fund. Additionally, formatting was updated to reflect the Senate version, and minor punctuation adjustments were made to existing text regarding service of process and insurer obligations.
Scope change
The bill's scope narrowed from a broad amendment covering both traffic enforcement and officer training to an exclusive focus on civil traffic violations and their associated penalties.
FISCAL
Deleted the requirement that $15 of every civil penalty collected from photo enforcement violations be deposited into the peace officer training equipment fund.
SCOPE
Changed the bill's title and description to focus solely on civil traffic violations rather than general traffic enforcement and officer training.
TECHNICAL
Updated document headers and section titles to reflect the Senate Engrossed Version instead of the House Engrossed Version.
Added semicolons to the end of several sentences regarding service of process and insurer obligations to improve grammatical consistency.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 26, 2026 · House Jun 11, 2026
How they voted
25–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 30
Feb 26, 2026
D
Democratic13
76% Yea
R
Republican17
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
6
Committee
1
Amendments
2
Jun 19, 2026
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor
executive
Jun 12, 2026
Upper · Passed
PASSED
upper
Jun 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Jun 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
PASSED
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Gowan
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1624
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1624. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline