municipal corporations; water supply; rates
HB 2328 amends Arizona law to require municipalities in counties with 1-4 million residents to charge the same water rates to residents living outside their city boundaries as they do to their own residents. This directly affects cities like Mesa or Chandler (if in such a county) that provide water to suburban or unincorporated areas. The key provision prohibits these municipalities from charging higher rates to non-resident customers, ensuring equal pricing for water services regardless of location within the service area. The bill does not change existing rate structures for water provided to other municipalities, which remain subject to prior agreements or cost-based studies. This policy change aims to prevent rate discrimination for customers outside municipal limits.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jan 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2026
Last action Mar 3, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (02/23/2026)
·
4 edits
·
Feb 23, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reorganized from a formal legislative introduction format into a clean, standalone statute text. While the formatting and header information were significantly cleaned up, the actual legal content regarding water rates and municipal powers remains substantively identical to the original version.
Scope change
The scope of applicability and legal effect remains unchanged; the bill still amends Section 9-511 of the Arizona Revised Statutes.
TECHNICAL
Removed the formal introduction headers (Representative names, session details) and replaced them with a standard 'House Engrossed' title page format.
Corrected inconsistent capitalization and removed redundant words (e.g., changed 'shall DOES NOT' to 'shall does not') found in the original draft.
Replaced the original line-numbered text with a clean, paragraph-based layout for better readability.
Added a specific statute identifier 'START_STATUTE9-511' and 'END_STATUTE' markers to the text, likely for automated legislative processing systems.
Floor votes · House Feb 23, 2026
How they voted
34–23
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 60
Feb 23, 2026
D
Democratic27
85% Nay
R
Republican33
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
1
Feb 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2328
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2328. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline