HB 2320 Arizona House · 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session

school districts; bonds; financial advisors

HB 2320 requires Arizona school districts to hire an independent, SEC-registered financial advisor before any bond election. The advisor must help the school board with bond issuance details like repayment structure, credit ratings, and hiring other professionals, while preparing required informational materials for voters. The bill prohibits these advisors from colluding on hiring other professionals or underwriting bonds they advised on. This directly affects all Arizona school districts seeking to issue bonds, mandating neutral financial guidance to ensure cost-effective borrowing. The law aims to standardize bond election processes with independent oversight.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2026 Last action Jun 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

House Engrossed Version (02/24/2026) Senate Engrossed Version (06/12/2026) · 3 edits · Feb 24, 2026
MINOR
The bill was amended to require independent municipal advisors to be paid only on a contingency fee basis, meaning they receive compensation only if voters approve the bond issuance. Additionally, a new exemption was added allowing school districts to skip hiring an advisor if they cannot find a qualified one willing to work on a contingency fee basis.
Scope change
The requirement for hiring an independent municipal advisor is now conditional on the ability to secure one on a contingency fee basis.
REQUIREMENT

The hiring requirement for an independent municipal advisor now explicitly mandates a 'contingency fee basis' for compensation.

A new provision states that advisors must only receive compensation if voters authorize the bond issuance in the election.

ELIGIBILITY

A new exemption allows school districts to forgo hiring an advisor if they make reasonable efforts but cannot find a qualified one willing to work on a contingency fee basis.

Floor votes · House Feb 24, 2026

How they voted

3521
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 60
Feb 24, 2026
D Democratic27
3 Yea 21 Nay 3
77% Nay
R Republican33
32 Yea 1
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
12
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Jun 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
DPA
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Feb 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
Feb 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors

Sponsors