municipalities; counties; fee increases; vote
SB 1013 would have required Arizona city councils and county boards to obtain a two-thirds vote approval for any increase in fees or taxes. It would have prevented local governments from creating additional rules about these increases, making such decisions a statewide policy matter under state law. The bill aimed to standardize the voting threshold for fee/tax hikes across all Arizona municipalities and counties. The bill failed to pass in March 2025 after committee review.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Jan 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Failed
Mar 2025
Governor
Introduced Dec 12, 2024
Last action Mar 31, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
House Engrossed Version
→
Senate Engrossed Version
·
4 edits
·
Feb 3, 2025
MODERATE
This bill fundamentally shifts from a drug policy focused on probation eligibility for substance possession to a local government finance reform. The original version addressed fentanyl and drug treatment, while the new version establishes two-thirds voting requirements for municipalities and counties to increase taxes or fees, declaring this a matter of statewide concern.
Scope change
The bill's scope changed from criminal justice and drug policy to local government fiscal authority and state preemption of local tax increases.
ELIGIBILITY
Removed all provisions regarding probation eligibility for drug possession, drug treatment requirements, and sentencing guidelines for fentanyl and methamphetamine.
REQUIREMENT
Added requirement that municipalities must obtain a two-thirds vote of their common council before levying or increasing any assessment, tax, or fee.
Added requirement that counties must obtain a two-thirds vote of their board of supervisors before levying or increasing any assessment, tax, or fee.
ENFORCEMENT
Added state preemption language stating that regulation of municipal and county tax increases is a matter of statewide concern and cannot be further regulated by local governments.
Floor votes · House Mar 31, 2025
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
1
Amendments
2
Mar 31, 2025
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (26-30-4)
house
Mar 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
DPA/SE
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
PASSED
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Jan 15, 2025
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Warren Petersen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1013
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1013. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline