HB 2671 Arizona House · 57th Legislature - First Regular Session

DCS; kinship care placement; requirement

HB 2671 would have required Arizona's Department of Child Safety (DCS) to establish kinship foster care services for children removed from their homes and placed in DCS custody. The bill mandated that DCS prioritize placing these children with relatives, extended family members (such as grandparents), or individuals with a significant relationship to the child. It also defined key terms like "kinship care" and provided detailed standards for "restrictive behavior management" to clarify foster care practices. The bill was passed by the legislature in May 2025 but vetoed by the Governor, so it did not become law.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Vetoed
May 2025
Introduced Jan 29, 2025 Vetoed May 12, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

House Engrossed Version Senate Engrossed Version · 6 edits · Apr 30, 2025
MODERATE
This bill amends Arizona's child welfare laws to strengthen kinship foster care provisions and clarify definitions related to family placement. The changes primarily focus on expanding who qualifies as an extended family member, requiring courts to prioritize placement with grandparents and relatives, and removing certain procedural requirements that were previously in place.
Scope change
The bill applies to all Arizona child welfare cases involving foster care and kinship placements, affecting how courts and the Department of Child Safety must evaluate and prioritize family placement options.
DEFINITION

Expanded the definition of 'extended family member' to explicitly include grandparents, ensuring they are recognized as priority placement options alongside other relatives.

REQUIREMENT

Removed a specific provision requiring the department to determine if placement is necessary to meet the child's needs, streamlining the decision-making process for kinship placements.

Changed language regarding placement risk assessments to remove the requirement of assessing risk to 'another member of the household' when determining if placement with relatives is in the child's best interest.

TIMELINE

Modified court hearing requirements and reporting deadlines to emphasize placing children with grandparents and relatives when available and in their best interest.

ENFORCEMENT

Removed provisions establishing abuse of judicial discretion for failing to order placement with relatives, shifting focus to best interest determinations rather than mandatory placement orders.

TECHNICAL

Corrected formatting errors and removed redundant or contradictory language throughout the statute, including fixing section numbering and clarifying references to family members.

Floor votes · Senate Apr 30, 2025 · House Feb 26, 2025

How they voted

270
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 30
Apr 30, 2025
D Democratic13
11 Yea 2
84% Yea
R Republican17
16 Yea 1
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
1
Amendments
3
May 12, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor
executive
May 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
PASSED
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
DPA
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors